Cheaper for whom?

Our TV has a column of dead pixels in the top right corner, not overly distracting but mildly annoying. On the whole the TV is fine but in comparing the cost to fix those dead pixels and the cost to replace the TV, it would be cheaper to replace the TV. My question is, cheaper for whom?

A closeup of a column of dead pixels, white over a darker background.

The dead pixels in question.

It would be cheaper for me, the middle class American who can order one online to be delivered to my door. But why is it cheaper to get a brand new TV, when mine is otherwise fine?

It is because other people bare the cost. The people who mine the materials for the electronics, the people that build up the pieces of the TV, the people that package the TV, the people that ship the TV, and the waste produced at every step of the way. Other people and the planet bare the cost between fixing a few dead pixels and replacing the whole TV.

This is true for so many of the luxuries we have in American and for why it is cheaper for us to replace the old thing than to fix the problem. It is cheaper for us at the expense of everyone else along the way.

Why should we have electric cars and smart phones when the rechargeable batteries in them require cobalt mined by slave labor in the Democratic Republic of Congo? Why should we have cheap fast fashion when the workers who produce those clothes make pennies on the dollar? Why should we have any of the luxuries we have, and don’t need, when the production of them is at the expensive of other people and the planet?

My answer is that we shouldn’t. As Americans we need to take a good hard look at our consumption and the impacts it has on people and the planet. This is not to say that the harm done along the way is only the responsibility of us as individuals but we have a lot more power then we realize. The companies that produce products for us at the expensive of other people are not going to change their ways just because they are harming people and the planet, they know about the harm and they do not care, but we must care. We must change our habits so it is no longer profitable for them to exploit the way that they do. The only thing that capitalist care about is profit, so in order to change their behavior we must make the thing we find undesirable, exploitation of people and the planet, less profitable for them.

Don’t fall into the lie that it is cheaper to replace something instead of fixing it. Consider your consumption, do you need to buy something new or can you fix what you have? Do you need to buy this thing or can you find fulfillment outside of consumption?

It is not cheaper to replace it instead of fixing it when you look at the cost as a whole and not just the immediate cost to you.

This is a Genocide

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

  1. Killing members of the group;
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
  4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
  5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
UN Genocide Convention

Source: Euro Med Human Rights Monitor As of 2/3/23

Total Destruction

c. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Impacts of the Destruction

Mass Slaughter

  1. Killing members of the group;
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

Source: Twitter & LA Times

Intentional Starvation

  1. Killing members of the group;
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

Births & Pregnancy

d. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    There has been a 300% increase in miscarriage rates in Gaza since October 7th. For pregnancies that go to term there are unsanitary conditions for birth and post-birth care, c-sections are being done without anesthesia and without adequate post-birth care. In the north especially, there is no food for breastfeeding or formula. All throughout the Gaza strip families are in tents or on the streets. [Sources: Jezebel, Siasat, Relief Web, WHO]

    Incitement to Genocide

    genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group

    Source: Law4Palestine

    It’s sad but I can’t do anything

    The United States is Israel’s closest ally, providing military, financial, and diplomatic aid.

    Source: Twitter & Jewish Insider

    Israel would not be able to continue the assault on Gaza if the US stopped sending aid.

    Source: Twitter & Jewish Insider

    The US has vetoed ceasefire votes in the UN Security Council three times already

    Source: Al Jezeera

    The US, along with other allies, cut off aid for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), the main organization dealing with the humanitarian crisis due to the ongoing assault on Gaza. [1] The US did this after the provisional ruling by the International Court of Justice that Israel’s assault on Gaza is at risk of being a genocide. [2, 3]

    American-Israeli Genocide of Palestinians

    We, as Americans, are fully complicit in the genocide of the Palestinian people. Our tax dollars are going to military, financial, and diplomatic aid of the genocide. Our government could end the genocide if they wanted to. We must demand an end to this genocide and an end to US support and complicity in the mistreatment of the Palestinian people.

    Blood is on our hands and inaction makes us responsible for the atrocities.

    Actions you can take

    Contact your representatives

    • Demand that they call for an immediate ceasefire and humanitarian aid

    Boycotts Divestments and Sanctions

    • Do what you can as a consumer to make sure you aren’t indirectly supporting genocide
    • Go the the BDS website for a list of companies to boycott

    Donate

    Learn more

    We will continue to add resources and posts with more information.

    Okay, but Oct. 7th…

    Most of the original reporting has been proved false or retracted.

    The civilian deaths

    Most of the casualties were military. The list in the tweet below show non civilian casualties as indicated by their military rank.

    Source

    But the destruction

    Israeli civilians and military have attested to the fact that Israel killed a lot of their own.

    It is the first known official army admission that a significant number of the hundreds of Israelis who died on 7 October were killed by Israel itself, and not by Hamas or other Palestinian resistance factions.

    Citing new data released by the Israeli military, Zitun wrote that: “Casualties fell as a result of friendly fire on October 7, but the IDF [Israeli military] believes that … it would not be morally sound to investigate” them.

    Electronic Intifada & Ynet

    Israeli outlet Ynet quoted the commander of an Israeli helicopter squadron who said that on 7 October the air force sent more than two dozen attack helicopters – as well as Elbit drones – to shoot all along the Gaza frontier using Hellfire missiles and machine guns.

    According to Ynet’s account of a preliminary assessment by the air force, “it was very difficult to distinguish between terrorists and [Israeli] soldiers or civilians” but that he instructed his pilots “to shoot at everything they see in the area of the fence” with Gaza anyway.

    Electronic Intifada & Ynet

    An Israeli woman who survived the Hamas assault on settlements near the Gaza boundary on 7 October says Israeli civilians were “undoubtedly” killed by their own security forces.

    It happened when Israeli forces engaged in fierce gun battles with Palestinian fighters in Kibbutz Be’eri and fired indiscriminately at both the fighters and their Israeli prisoners.

    “They eliminated everyone, including the hostages,” she told Israeli radio. “There was very, very heavy crossfire” and even tank shelling.

    In the Channel 12 interview, Porat elaborates that although the Palestinian fighters all had loaded weapons, she never saw them shoot captives or threaten them with their guns.

    Golan presses: “So our forces may have shot them?”

    “Undoubtedly,” the former captive responds, and adds, “They eliminated everyone, including the hostages because there was very, very heavy crossfire.”

    “After insane crossfire, two tank shells were shot into the house. It’s a small kibbutz house, nothing big,” Porat explains.

    Electronic Intifada & Haaretz

    How they were treated

    “They did not abuse us. They treated us very humanely,” Porat explained to a surprised Golan in the Kan radio interview.

    “By that I mean they guard us,” she said. “They give us something to drink here and there. When they see we are nervous they calm us down. It was very frightening but no one treated us violently. Luckily nothing happened to me like what I heard in the media.”

    “They were very humane towards us,” Porat said in her Channel 12 interview. She recalled that one Palestinian fighter who spoke Hebrew, “told me, ‘Look at me well, we’re not going to kill you. We want to take you to Gaza. We are not going to kill you. So be calm, you’re not going to die.’ That’s what he told me, in those words.”

    In addition to providing the captives with drinking water, she said the fighters let them go outside to the lawn because it was hot, especially as the electricity was cut.

    Electronic Intifada & Haaretz
    Interview with one of the survivors from the kibbutz.

    What about the horrible violence

    Most of the initial reporting has been retracted or revised. Only one baby died, 10 month old Mila Cohen, likely due to cross fire. [Times of Israel] There is no evidence of massive rape of civilians (image below). The New York Times article claiming sexual violence on Oct. 7th hinged on one women, her family says there is no evidence she was assaulted. [Link]

    Source: Twitter & Haaretz

    Why did Hamas take hostages?

    Hostages were taken to achieve a prisoner swap. There is a history of hostage exchanges between Israel and Hamas. In 2011, 1027 Palestinian political prisoners were released in exchange for one Israeli soldier. [1, 2] On October 7th there were 1264 Palestinians held in administrative detention, without charge or trail. [3] There were over 800 Palestinian children held in detention in 2023. [4]

    Treatment of Hostages

    Video showing the release of some of the hostages.

    There are statements from released hostages about how well they were treated. [5]

    The behavior of the Hamas fighters on Oct. 7th.

    We can compare this to how Palestinians are treated in Israeli prisons where there are allegations of torture, beatings, sexual assault, and more. [6, 7, 8] See the videos in this Al Jazeera article for accounts from released political prisoners. [Article]

    Summary

    Hamas took hostages to use in a prisoner swap, which is something they have done with Israel before. The hostages were treated well as reported by released hostages. In comparison Palestinian political prisoners experience torture and more.

    Sources

    1 Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange

    2 History of prisoner swaps

    3 Why are there so many Palestinians in Israeli prisons?

    4 880 Palestinian children in detention

    [5] Humane treatment by Hamas

    [6] Israeli soldiers abuse Palestinian prisoners

    [7] Abuse by soldiers

    [8] Wikipedia on abuse of political prisoners

    Day 42

    Copyright © 2017 AJ+, All rights reserved.

    What it means to defund Planned Parenthood

    15873221_10154279322899639_622048284640149145_n

    The GOP is hell bent on “defunding” Planned Parenthood, but most people don’t actually know what that means. No federal money is donated to or designated for PP. The federal money PP gets is from medicaid and title X reimbursement.
    A low income patient comes in -> they get whatever treatment -> PP files a claim through medicaid or title X like they would with an insurance company -> PP is reimbursed for services provided.

    One big thing to note, the reimbursement does not cover the full cost of services. This is the big reason PP is so important. Because of the philanthropy side of it, they can take care of medicaid and title X patients. The donations, private donations, can cover what the reimbursement fails to cover. [Side note: that is also why it is good for people who have private insurance to use PP. They will reimburse in full.] Other community healthcare clinics cannot afford to take on the number of medicaid and title X patients that PP covers because they do not have the same donation support.

    I give you a series of tweets on the subject.

    fullsizerender-46fullsizerender-49fullsizerender-43fullsizerender-50fullsizerender-52fullsizerender-51fullsizerender-45fullsizerender-53fullsizerender-47fullsizerender-48

    Sources in tweets: One, two, three

    From Planned Parenthood:16406877_10154353702239639_7619410250597657134_n

    Today

    From: Copyright © 2017 AJ+, All rights reserved.

    EDIT